精品一区二区三区乱码_日韩论理电影在线免费观看_亚洲卡一卡2卡三卡4卡1272_天堂中文最新版在线官网公司 _国产精品久久久久久波多野_人人久久精品亚洲_韩国成人黄色视频_一级毛片在线免费看视频
食品伙伴網(wǎng)
食品資訊
EFSA就采用納米技術(shù)的食品和飼料所潛在的危害發(fā)表意見
日期:2009-03-06  來源:歐盟食品安全局

    食品伙伴網(wǎng)導(dǎo)讀:2009年3月5日,歐盟食品安全局就采用納米技術(shù)食品飼料所潛在的危害發(fā)表意見。

    原文報道:EFSA is today publishing its scientific opinion on nanoscience and nanotechnologies in relation to food and feed safety. EFSA’s Scientific Committee (SC) has concluded that established international approaches to risk assessment[1] can also be applied to engineered nano materials (ENM). The SC also concluded that a case-by-case approach would be necessary and that, in practice, current data limitations and a lack of validated test methodologies could make risk assessment of specific nano products very difficult and subject to a high degree of uncertainty.

This opinion focuses on the use of nanotechnologies, particularly ENMs, in the food and feed chain. It elaborates on approaches and methodologies available for risk assessment of these very small particles but does not address any specific applications of particular ENMs. The European Commission (EC) asked for this opinion because consideration needs to be given as to whether existing risk assessment approaches can be appropriately applied to this new technology.

The EFSA SC recommends that additional research and investigation is needed to address the many current uncertainties and data limitations. Specific recommendations include the following:

Prof Vittorio Silano, chair of EFSA’s Scientific Committee, said:

“The Scientific Committee has concluded that in principle it is possible to undertake risk assessments in this emerging scientific area by making use of available international approaches. However, given current data gaps and limitations in a number of cases, it may be very difficult to provide fully satisfactory conclusions.

“This issue will remain a priority for EFSA’s Scientific Committee. We are establishing a working group of experts to be kept informed of any emerging scientific and other data that will help us deliver the best possible scientific opinions based on the most up-to-date evidence available. EFSA will take a cautious case-by-case approach and looks forward to further data and research becoming available to help inform future scientific opinions.”

EFSA’s SC, which includes the chairs of all of EFSA’s Panels, has undertaken this work as it has a multi-disciplinary character and is relevant to a number of the EFSA Panels’ respective areas of expertise. The SC has been assisted by a working group of scientists with relevant expertise. Feedback from a public consultation held during 2008 was taken into account before the final opinion was adopted by the SC.

EFSA’s opinion will help the EC to explore appropriate measures, assess existing legislation and determine the scope of possible further requests for scientific opinions from EFSA in this field. EFSA has already received a small number of such requests and is adopting the case-by-case approach.

    詳情見:EFSA is today publishing its scientific opinion on nanoscience and nanotechnologies in relation to food and feed safety. EFSA’s Scientific Committee (SC) has concluded that established international approaches to risk assessment[1] can also be applied to engineered nano materials (ENM). The SC also concluded that a case-by-case approach would be necessary and that, in practice, current data limitations and a lack of validated test methodologies could make risk assessment of specific nano products very difficult and subject to a high degree of uncertainty.

This opinion focuses on the use of nanotechnologies, particularly ENMs, in the food and feed chain. It elaborates on approaches and methodologies available for risk assessment of these very small particles but does not address any specific applications of particular ENMs. The European Commission (EC) asked for this opinion because consideration needs to be given as to whether existing risk assessment approaches can be appropriately applied to this new technology.

The EFSA SC recommends that additional research and investigation is needed to address the many current uncertainties and data limitations. Specific recommendations include the following:

Prof Vittorio Silano, chair of EFSA’s Scientific Committee, said:

“The Scientific Committee has concluded that in principle it is possible to undertake risk assessments in this emerging scientific area by making use of available international approaches. However, given current data gaps and limitations in a number of cases, it may be very difficult to provide fully satisfactory conclusions.

“This issue will remain a priority for EFSA’s Scientific Committee. We are establishing a working group of experts to be kept informed of any emerging scientific and other data that will help us deliver the best possible scientific opinions based on the most up-to-date evidence available. EFSA will take a cautious case-by-case approach and looks forward to further data and research becoming available to help inform future scientific opinions.”

EFSA’s SC, which includes the chairs of all of EFSA’s Panels, has undertaken this work as it has a multi-disciplinary character and is relevant to a number of the EFSA Panels’ respective areas of expertise. The SC has been assisted by a working group of scientists with relevant expertise. Feedback from a public consultation held during 2008 was taken into account before the final opinion was adopted by the SC.

EFSA’s opinion will help the EC to explore appropriate measures, assess existing legislation and determine the scope of possible further requests for scientific opinions from EFSA in this field. EFSA has already received a small number of such requests and is adopting the case-by-case approach.

推薦資訊
?2008- 2022 食品伙伴網(wǎng) All Rights Reserved
首頁 客戶端 電腦端 頂部
安裝食品伙伴網(wǎng)App
×
桐庐县| 宝应县| 根河市| 宣恩县| 佛山市| 莱芜市| 安塞县| 双流县| 南皮县| 武乡县| 五峰| 桑植县| 深水埗区| 康乐县| 渝北区| 绵竹市| 丹东市| 银川市| 云浮市| 奉节县| 靖宇县| 柳江县| 济南市| 仙桃市| 綦江县| 石河子市| 雅江县| 塘沽区| 阿城市| 扶沟县| 务川| 溧水县| 吉首市| 达拉特旗| 开封县| 桦甸市| 乌拉特中旗| 嵊州市| 漳州市| 宁化县| 静安区|